Last year, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a request for a preliminary injunction to stop the construction of a domestic oil pipeline known as the Flanagan South Pipeline that is to be constructed under the supervision of Enbridge Pipelines, LLC. In that decision, reported at…
Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law Blog
Corrective Action Catch 22: Court of Federal Claims Holds Agency Action Must Be Rational Even If GAO Protest Decision Was Not
Today, Pillsbury attorney Joël Van Over published his advisory titled Corrective Action Catch 22: Court of Federal Claims Holds Agency Action Must Be Rational Even If GAO Protest Decision Was Not. The Advisory discusses the U.S. Court of Federal Claims’ July 15, 2014 decision in RUSH Construction, Inc. v. United…
9th Cir. Vacates PSD Permit Granted to Avenal Power After Revised and More Stringent Emissions Standards Were Promulgated
In the case of Sierra Club, et. al., v. EPA, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that EPA cannot rely on Chevron deference to authorize its grant of a Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit to Avenal Power Center based on superseded National Ambient Air Quality…
Spotlight On Federal Contractors’ Labor Practices
Recently President Obama issued an Executive Order purportedly seeking to increase efficiency and cost savings in the work performed by parties who contract with the Federal Government by ensuring that they understand and comply with labor laws. In sum, the Executive Order requires contractors seeking federal contracts to disclose labor…
8th Cir. Holds that Union Pacific’s CERCLA Settlement with EPA Trumps Tolling Agreement
On August 8, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a ruling affirming the lower court’s holding that Union Pacific (UP) did not breach the tolling agreement it entered into with ASARCO, LLC while a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) dispute was being resolved with EPA.…
Determining the Number of Occurrences Arising From Multiple Construction Defects … It Depends on Who Is Sued
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon held that property damage incurred to a condominium project resulting from a myriad of construction defects constituted just one occurrence under the relevant excess general liability policy. In Chartis Specialty Ins. Co. v. American Contractors Ins. Co. Risk Retention Group…
7th Cir. Holds Wisconsin Town’s Refusal to Process Building Permits for a Wind Farm Not Subject to Constitutional Due Process Challenge
In the case of CEnergy-Glenmore Wind Farm #1, LLC, v. Town of Glenmore, decided on August 7, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the lower court’s ruling that the Town of Glenmore, Wisconsin’s delay and final rejection of wind farm building permits did not violate…
“Ban the Box” Legislation Expands Across the Country ~ Employers Need to Update Employment Applications and Policies
Yesterday, Pillsbury attorneys Ken Taber, Paula Weber, Rebecca Carr Rizzo and Stephen Asay published their advisory titled “Ban the Box” Legislation Expands Across the Country Employers Need to Update Employment Applications and Policies. The Advisory discusses the growing national movement to “Ban the Box” – i.e., to prohibit questions about…
9th Cir. Ninth Circuit Holds Coast Guard “Letter of Recommendation” Provided in LNG Permitting Matter Was Not a Final Agency Action Triggering Appellate Review
In Columbia Riverkeeper, et al. v. U.S. Coast Guard, decided on August 5, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a Coast Guard “Letter of Recommendation” provided to FERC in connection with FERC’s ongoing review of a proposed Oregon LNG terminal project was not a…
4th Cir. Orders Lower Court to Conduct Additional Hearings on Environmental Challenge to North Carolina Outer Banks Transportation Project
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently reviewed the lower court’s rejection of a series of challenges to an important North Carolina highway transportation project that will repair and restore access to the North Carolina Outer Banks. The case is Defenders of Wildlife, et al., v. North…