Articles Posted in Environmental

Posted
by

The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 includes, at pages 1768-1786 of the bill, the “Brownfields Utilization, Investment, and Local Development Act of 2018,” also known as the “BUILD Act.” This is a bi-partisan bill whose enactment has been spurred by the realization there may be as many as 450,000 Brownfields sites around the country that require some financial assistance to be cleaned up and restored to productive uses. In contrast, there are only 1300 sites on the Superfund National Priorities List.

Continue Reading ›

Posted
by

On March 20, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided the case of Marquette County Road Commission v. U.S. EPA, et al. The opinion will not be published in the Federal Reporter. Both the trial court and the Sixth Circuit rejected the Marquette County Road Commission’s argument that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) actions and inactions amounted to a “veto,” and were thus a “final action” for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

Continue Reading ›

Posted
by

Many lawsuits have been filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims alleging that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) management of the Missouri River flood control system has resulted in the serious flooding of many properties located in several states that are located adjacent to the river, and that this amounts to an unconstitutional “taking” of their property in violation of the U.S. Constitution. On March 13, 2018, a very long opinion (more than 250 pages) was released following extensive hearings which holds that these claims have merit, and now the court will decide whether the plaintiffs may be entitled to an appropriate amount of compensation. The case is Ideker Farms, Inc., et al,., v. The United States, based on the evidence submitted regarding 44 plaintiffs selected as representative or “Bellwether” plaintiffs.

Continue Reading ›

Posted
by

On Friday, March 9, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued another significant ruling in a Clean Water Act (CWA) Citizen Suit case. Affirming the District Court, the Ninth Circuit held

“pipes, ditches, and channels that discharge pollutants from non-concentrated aquatic animal production facilities are point sources within the meaning of 33 U.S.C. § 1362(14).”

The case is Olympic Forest Coalition v. Coast Seafoods Corp.

Continue Reading ›

Posted
by

On March 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision interpreting Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 and the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission’s (FERC) permitting authority, which may have settled some lingering legal issues for the construction of pipelines. The case is New York State Department of Environmental conservation, et al., v. FERC.

The Second Circuit considered two issues:

  1. Whether FERC correctly held that NYSDEC waived its right to act on Millennium Pipeline Company’s (Millennium) application; and
  2. Whether FERC appropriate accepted and reviewed the application as subject to its exclusive jurisdiction under the Natural Gas Act.

Continue Reading ›

Posted
by

On March 5, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a ruling that the general federal five-year statute of limitations which is applicable to the enforcement of any civil fines, penalties or forfeitures (28 U.S.C. § 2462) does not apply to a series of discrete misappropriations that occurred over many years. The case is SEC v. Kokesh. In reaching this conclusion, the Tenth Circuit referenced its own recent decision in Sierra Club v. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co., a Clean Air Citizen Suit, involving Section 2462

Continue Reading ›

Posted
by

On February 26, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, a challenge to the President’s Executive Order 13771, and two guidance documents issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that instruct the affected federal agencies on how to administer EO 13771. The case is Public Citizen, Inc., et al., v. Trump. However, the District Court stated it would hold another hearing (on March 1, 2018) to determine whether it should dismiss the complaint outright or give the plaintiffs an opportunity to amend their pleading.

Continue Reading ›

Posted
by

On February 27, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rejected motions filed by the cities of Oakland and San Francisco to remand two global warming public nuisance lawsuits filed by the cities in state court against several large energy companies (BP P.L.C., Chevron Corporation, ConocoPhillips Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation and Royal Dutch Shell plc). The case is The People of the State of California v. BP P.L.C., et al.

Continue Reading ›

Posted
by

On February 27, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana granted a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by a group of environmental plaintiffs seeking to halt the construction of an oil pipeline in the Atchafalaya Basin in Louisiana, which has received Clean Water Act (CWA) permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). The case is Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, et al., v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Continue Reading ›

Posted
by

On March 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals decided the case of Bethpage Water Dist. v. Northrop Grumman Corp., and affirmed the lower court’s dismissal on New York statute of limitations grounds, the Bethpage Water District’s (BWD) lawsuit seeking damages from Northrop Grumman Corporation (Northrop) for alleged volatile organic compounds (VOC) contamination of the aquifer from which BWD draws drinking water.

Continue Reading ›