Our colleague John Jensen recently published his Alert titled Proposals Should Carefully Address Pending Corporate Deals Lockheed Martin’s recent success in overcoming GAO protests shows that fully explaining a transaction in the works can be a key proposal element. In the Alert, John discusses the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) recently announced denial of three protests filed by disappointed offerors Enterprise Services LLC, Accenture Federal Services LLC and CSRA LLC challenging the Social Security Administration’s award of an IT contract to Lockheed Martin Corp.
Employers Get Ready for 401(k) Plan Changes
Posted
Our colleagues Christine Richardson, Colleen Lamarre and Danielle Bradley recently posted their Alert titled Recent and Upcoming Changes to 401(k) Plans. In the Alert they discuss the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act) and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (the Budget), and the number of modifications they make to the 401(k) plan rules. The modifications are expected to make the administration of 401(k) plans simpler by removing operational burdens, while also giving plan sponsors the ability to offer more options to employees.
Tenth Circuit Considers Federal 5-Year SOL: Does It Involve Separately Accruing Causes of Action Or A Continuing Violation
Posted
On March 5, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a ruling that the general federal five-year statute of limitations which is applicable to the enforcement of any civil fines, penalties or forfeitures (28 U.S.C. § 2462) does not apply to a series of discrete misappropriations that occurred over many years. The case is SEC v. Kokesh. In reaching this conclusion, the Tenth Circuit referenced its own recent decision in Sierra Club v. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co., a Clean Air Citizen Suit, involving Section 2462
District Court Inclined To Dismiss Action Challenging EO 13771
Posted
On February 26, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, a challenge to the President’s Executive Order 13771, and two guidance documents issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that instruct the affected federal agencies on how to administer EO 13771. The case is Public Citizen, Inc., et al., v. Trump. However, the District Court stated it would hold another hearing (on March 1, 2018) to determine whether it should dismiss the complaint outright or give the plaintiffs an opportunity to amend their pleading.
Global Warming Public Nuisance Actions Will Stay In Federal Court
Posted
On February 27, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rejected motions filed by the cities of Oakland and San Francisco to remand two global warming public nuisance lawsuits filed by the cities in state court against several large energy companies (BP P.L.C., Chevron Corporation, ConocoPhillips Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation and Royal Dutch Shell plc). The case is The People of the State of California v. BP P.L.C., et al.
Preliminary Injunction Issued Stalling Oil Pipeline Construction in Atchafalaya Basin
Posted
On February 27, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana granted a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by a group of environmental plaintiffs seeking to halt the construction of an oil pipeline in the Atchafalaya Basin in Louisiana, which has received Clean Water Act (CWA) permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). The case is Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, et al., v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Water District’s VOC Claims Time Barred
Posted
On March 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals decided the case of Bethpage Water Dist. v. Northrop Grumman Corp., and affirmed the lower court’s dismissal on New York statute of limitations grounds, the Bethpage Water District’s (BWD) lawsuit seeking damages from Northrop Grumman Corporation (Northrop) for alleged volatile organic compounds (VOC) contamination of the aquifer from which BWD draws drinking water.
Ninth Circuit Denies Without Prejudice, Government’s Mandamus Petition to Stop the Oregon Climate Change Case Brought by Minors
Posted
Today the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in In re United States of America. As summarized by the Ninth Circuit, “twenty one young plaintiffs” filed a complaint in the Portland, OR federal district court alleging that the defendant Executive Branch officials have known for many years that the burning of fossil fuels destabilizes the climate – contributing to climate change, violating their constitutional rights. The Government sought mandamus relief in the Ninth Circuit, “anticipating burdensome discovery,” and a stay of this litigation.
The Ninth Circuit denied relief, believing that it is best to let this litigation continue — at least for a while — and to more fully develop the record. The Ninth Circuit assures the Government that there are remedies available in the trial court and the Ninth Circuit if they are needed.
Brief Report On RCRA Developments
Posted
Here’s a brief report on recent Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) developments:
1. On February 26, the Environmental Protection Agency published a Federal Register notice informing the public that it will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) an information collection request regarding the operation of four final 2015 revisions to the definition of solid waste regarding in particular the “generator-controlled exclusion”; the “verified recycler exclusion”; the manufacturing exclusion; and the revised speculative accumulation requirement.
California’s Proposition 13 Protection Is Once Again in the Crosshairs
Posted
Over the last few decades, there have been more than a few proposals seeking to limit or remove the protections Proposition 13 affords to some types of real estate. In their recent client alert, colleagues Craig A. Becker and Breann E. Robowski examine Initiative 17-0055, which would make two significant changes to California’s property tax system, including the elimination of Prop 13 protection for commercial and industrial real estate.