Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law Blog

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) have released a pre-publication copy of a Final Rule that was proposed on November 22, 2017 and which will soon be published in the Federal Register. The new rule will establish an “applicability date” for the controversial “waters of the United States” (or WOTUS) rule that was published in the Federal Register on June 29, 2015. The 2015 rule had an effective date of August 28, 2015, but the rule was first stayed by the U.S. District Court for North Dakota on August 27, 2015 for the 13 states challenging the rule in that court, and then by a nationwide stay by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on October 9, 2015.

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense (NAM decision), ruled that the federal District Courts, and not the U.S. Courts of Appeals, had original jurisdiction to hear these appeals, so it appears there will be multiplicious litigation around the country.

Continue Reading ›

On January 29, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit became the latest federal Court of Appeals to issue a ruling reviving federal District Court challenges to the 2015 Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA)/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) Clean Water Act (CWA) rule redefining “Waters of the United States.” The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma dismissed challenges to this rule filed by the Chamber of Commerce, the National Federation of Businesses, Tulsa Regional Chamber, Portland Cement Association, and the State Chamber of Oklahoma, holding that the appeal must be brought in the US Court of Appeals. The Tenth Circuit abated these appeals, pending the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in National Assoc. of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense (the NAM Decision). On January 22, 2018, the Supreme Court held that such challenges must be filed in the federal district courts, causing the Tenth Circuit to lift the abatement, and return the case to the District Court. The Tenth Circuit case is Chamber of Commerce of the U.S, et al. v. EPA, et al.

On January 29, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in an interesting unpublished ruling, affirmed the District Court’s denial of a motion to vacate an arbitration order of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (Board). The Board rejected an appeal made by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (LDNR) objecting to a determination of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that millions of dollars in federal funds should be made available for the restoration of 16 barrier islands off the coast of Louisiana that suffered substantial damage from Hurricanes Rita and Katrina in 2005. The case is Louisiana Department of Natural Resources through the Coastal Protection Restoration Authority v. FEMA.

Continue Reading ›

Today, our colleagues Mark Elliott and Kevin Ashe published their Alert titled Getting the Lead Out of California Schools.  The Alert discusses California’s new water supply permit requirements and the State Water Board’s Drinking Water for Schools Grant Program, which allocates up to $9.5M in funding to improve access to and the quality of public school drinking water. Key takeaways include:

• Water purveyors serving K-12 schools must now collect & analyze school’s samples from water fountains and faucets, if requested by school or district.
• In November 2017, the State Water Board began accepting grant applications to fund projects that improve drinking water quality in public schools.
• Grants. which may be used toward a number of eligible projects and/or interim supplies, will be awarded until the $9.5M in fund runs out or June 30, 2019, whichever occurs first.

Today, our colleagues Kevin Ashe, and Eric Moorman posted their Alert titled Natural Resources Agency Launches CEQA Guidelines Rulemaking. The Alert  discusses the California Natural Resources Agency’s issuances of a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on January 26, 2018. The NPRM proposes a comprehensive update to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations, to reflect recent legislative changes to CEQA, clarify certain portions of the existing CEQA Guidelines, and update the CEQA Guidelines consistent with recent court decisions.” Key takeaways include:

• The proposed CEQA Guidelines amendments are the most comprehensive update since 1998.
• The proposal would also adopt the Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) methodology for transportation impact analysis.
• Comments on the proposed CEQA Guidelines are due to the Natural Resources Agency by March 15, 2018.

On January 24, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal of a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia that denied a preliminary injunction that would have enjoined the enforcement of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ redefinition of the regulatory term, “Waters of the United States” (the WOTUS rule). This action swiftly followed the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, which held that the initial appeal of the WOTUS rule cannot proceed in the federal Courts of Appeals . The decision of the lower court was vacated and remanded for further proceedings in light of the National Association of Manufacturers decision. More such rulings are likely to follow soon. This case is State of Georgia, et al., v. Pruitt.